AATL Investigative Release Published July 6, 2026 at 2:45 PM Central
Arkansas Accountability Tip Line
Open Inquiry Legislative Records Financial Disclosures Ethics Matter

State Rep M. Richmond. APRI.

Official Arkansas legislative records show Representative Marcus Richmond sponsored HB 1715 and House Amendment No. 1 in 2017. The amendment explicitly named America’s Pet Registry, Inc. Records later reviewed by AATL identify APRI as a significant Richmond household financial interest.

The legislative record is confirmed.

Briefing timestamp: July 6, 2026 • 2:45 PM Central
Updated to reflect subsequent BLR response received by AATL

Documented

Legislative sponsorship, APRI references in House Amendment No. 1, APRI standards language, amendment adoption, later withdrawal of HB 1715, and later financial disclosures reviewed by AATL.

Still Unresolved

The exact APRI financial arrangement during the March 2017 legislative period and the origin of the APRI specific drafting language.

Next Update

Upon receipt of material records, official responses, additional source information, or evidence that changes the present analysis.

Investigative Finding

A named company entered the amendment. The financial record came later.

The Arkansas Accountability Tip Line has documented a specific intersection between Representative Marcus Richmond’s 2017 legislative activity and America’s Pet Registry, Inc., commonly identified as APRI. Official Arkansas General Assembly records show Richmond was the lead sponsor of HB 1715 and the sponsor of House Amendment No. 1. That amendment expressly named APRI in proposed statutory language.

AATL has also reviewed later sworn Statements of Financial Interest identifying APRI in connection with significant Richmond household income, business or holding interests, and Susan Richmond’s role as President and CEO.

The distinction matters: this briefing does not claim that the later disclosures alone prove the exact financial arrangement that existed in March 2017. That timing question remains open and is one of the central subjects of the continuing inquiry.

The established record

Start with what can be proven.

The strongest public interest inquiry begins by separating the official record from inference. Open each finding to examine what is established and what remains unresolved.

The official Arkansas General Assembly bill page identifies Representative Richmond as the lead sponsor of HB 1715 during the 2017 Regular Session.
Open Official Bill History
The official bill history lists Richmond as sponsor of House Amendment No. 1. The amendment document itself also identifies Representative Richmond.
Open Official Amendment
The amendment text expressly referenced America’s Pet Registry, Inc. in proposed statutory language. The company was not merely discussed outside the bill text. Its name appeared in the amendment itself.
Review the Amendment Text
Proposed Section 17 56 114 stated that, when establishing rules, a county sheriff could consider corresponding standards established by specified organizations, including America’s Pet Registry, Inc. This is one of the most consequential APRI references in the amendment because it placed APRI standards inside a proposed public regulatory framework.
The official history shows Amendment No. 1 was adopted on March 15, 2017. On March 21, 2017, HB 1715 was withdrawn by the author and recommended for interim study. AATL states this directly because legislative proposal, amendment adoption, enactment, and codification are not the same thing.
Verify Official Status History
Statements of Financial Interest reviewed by AATL identify APRI in categories involving household income exceeding $12,500, a business or holding exceeding $12,500, a holding disclosed under Susan and Marcus Richmond, and Susan Richmond as President and CEO. The precise financial arrangement during March 2017 remains unresolved. AATL does not collapse a later disclosure into proof of an earlier financial condition.

The question is no longer whether APRI appears in the amendment.

It does. The unresolved questions are who caused or supplied that language, what financial interest existed during the legislative period, and what the full contemporaneous record shows.

APRI inside the amendment

One company. Two material appearances.

House Amendment No. 1 did more than mention breeders generally. APRI appeared by name in proposed statutory language reviewed by AATL.

Amendment Text • Registry Provision

APRI as a named registry

The amendment referenced nationally recognized registry services and expressly included America’s Pet Registry, Inc. among the named examples.

The significance is not that APRI was the only registry named. It was not. The significance is that a specifically identified company later appearing in Richmond household financial disclosures was expressly present in legislation sponsored by Richmond.
Amendment Text • Sheriff Rules

APRI standards inside proposed rulemaking

The amendment further provided that county sheriffs establishing rules could consider corresponding standards established by specifically named organizations, including APRI.

This provision is central to the open inquiry because it raises a precise sourcing question: why was APRI selected for express inclusion, and who supplied or requested that language?

Legislative chronology

Follow the record in sequence.

February 27, 2017

HB 1715 filed

Official legislative records identify Richmond as lead sponsor.

March 14, 2017

House Amendment No. 1 formally listed

The official bill page identifies Richmond as the amendment sponsor.

March 15, 2017

Amendment adopted

Official history shows Amendment No. 1 was read and adopted and the bill ordered engrossed.

March 21, 2017

Bill withdrawn by author

The official history records withdrawal by the author and a recommendation for interim study. HB 1715 did not become law.

Later Disclosures

APRI appears in household financial records reviewed by AATL

AATL’s inquiry then turned to the unresolved timing question: what exact APRI financial interest existed during the March 2017 legislative period?

July 2026

Source of APRI drafting language remains unresolved

AATL sought a narrow factual clarification from the Bureau of Legislative Research. BLR declined to disclose the requested information, citing a FOIA exemption involving communications between General Assembly members and Bureau staff.

Records reviewed by AATL

The later disclosures change the significance of the question.

According to Statements of Financial Interest reviewed by AATL, APRI appears in multiple significant household financial categories.

Evidence boundary: these later disclosures are material to the inquiry, but this release does not treat them as automatic proof of the exact financial arrangement that existed during March 2017.
Household Income

APRI identified as a household income source exceeding $12,500.

Business or Holding

APRI identified as a business or holding exceeding $12,500.

Disclosed Holding

APRI holding identified under Susan and Marcus Richmond.

Executive Role

Susan Richmond identified as President and CEO of APRI.

The inquiry is now narrow

Two questions still control this investigation.

01

What exact APRI financial interest existed during March 2017?

Later financial disclosures are material, but the precise contemporaneous arrangement must still be established through records rather than assumption.

02

Who caused or supplied the APRI specific language?

AATL is examining whether the language originated in material supplied to BLR, emerged during drafting, or was requested through another legislative or stakeholder communication.

Investigative Development • July 2026

AATL asked a narrow question. BLR declined to answer it.

The Arkansas Accountability Tip Line sought a factual clarification from the Bureau of Legislative Research concerning whether the APRI specific language in House Amendment No. 1 originated in material supplied to BLR or was first introduced during BLR drafting.

According to correspondence received by AATL, BLR Director Marty Garrity declined to disclose the requested information and stated that it fell within a Freedom of Information Act exemption concerning communications between members of the General Assembly and Bureau staff.

What this means: AATL is not reporting that BLR confirmed who supplied the APRI language. It did not. The origin remains unresolved because the Bureau declined to disclose the requested information.

Evidence matrix

What is established. What is not.

This briefing uses different evidence classifications because a documented fact, an AATL held record, and an unresolved question are not interchangeable.

Supported by the official Arkansas General Assembly bill history.
Supported by the official bill history and amendment document.
Supported by the official amendment text, including both registry language and the sheriff standards provision.
The official history records withdrawal by the author on March 21, 2017 and recommendation for interim study.
Based on sworn financial disclosure records reviewed by AATL. The exact March 2017 arrangement remains a separate unresolved question.
AATL states that it received confirmation that an investigation commenced following a complaint concerning Representative Richmond. This briefing does not characterize commencement of an investigation as a finding that a violation occurred.
Not yet established to AATL’s evidentiary standard.
Unresolved. BLR declined to disclose the requested sourcing information according to correspondence received by AATL.

Evidentiary limits

What this briefing does not establish.

No Criminal Finding

AATL has not determined that Representative Richmond committed a criminal offense.

No Adjudicated Ethics Violation

Commencement of an investigation is not the same as a final agency finding, adjudication, or determination of liability.

No Assumed 2017 Financial Arrangement

Later disclosures are material but do not automatically prove the exact APRI financial arrangement during March 2017.

AATL

This investigation remains open

Know who supplied the language? Bring the record.

AATL is seeking direct knowledge and documentation concerning HB 1715, House Amendment No. 1, ISP 2017 024, APRI’s inclusion in the amendment, stakeholder communications, drafting materials, 2017 financial arrangements, and relevant interim meeting records.

Useful information may include emails, drafts, attachments, calendars, text messages, meeting notes, stakeholder communications, firsthand accounts, archived records, or information identifying who requested specific APRI language.

Previous
Previous